Development, Inner Game, Personal, Relationships - Written by Entropy on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 13:40 - 20 Comments
The Isolation Paradox, Ctd.
My last post raised a hellstorm of comments. All fantastic and inciteful. I encourage you to read it if you haven’t, and also be sure to check out the comments. This post is a response to all of the comments. The promised follow up on how this affects pick up (rather than just relationships) will come in a couple days.
“Isn’t part of successfully being with someone long term not about finding the perfect, flawless person, but in finding someone who’s more or less what you’re looking for, and then accepting that no one will be totally perfect, and making peace with their flaws?
That attitude is something that comes from within. If you have this sense that no one is good enough for you, then the answer isn’t in some perfect woman out there, it’s in changing your view of things.”
Yes to the first paragraph, no to the second. You’re absolutely right that there’s no “flawless” woman out there for us. The defining aspect of love is that we accept and even cherish a person’s flaws.
What I’m referring to is actually what the first commenter gets at: fulfilling emotional needs. The more developed one comes, the more sophisticated ones emotional needs are, and by definition, the rarer it is to find somebody who meets them.
To give you an example. Most newbies, and this was true for myself at one time, have a large need for validation in their relationships when they’re inexperienced. That’s why almost any semi-attractive girl who comes along and makes them feel like a king, they become attached to. But as time goes on, the more our identity accepts that we are loved by women, the less validation we look for from them — or at least, the validation changes. These days, it’s far more important that I feel understood by a woman than simply cared for by her. I feel like she needs to understand my motivations and dreams and passions and empathize with them. It’s very easy to find a woman who thinks the world of me these days. It’s very hard to find one who understands my world.
You also mentioned the BradP quote. You’re totally right and got me there. I have two responses to that, though: 1) I made that comment when I was happily in a relationship, and 2) I have no problem ever finding COOL women. I find cool women all the time. Every night. In fact, I feel like the better my game gets, the more I come to appreciate how cool each individual girl is. What I DO find more and more difficult is a woman who fulfills my emotional needs. If that’s what Brad meant, then I was unfair to criticize him. But if he really meant that he can never find a cool girl anymore, then he’s just shallow and I stand by that.
The other thing this post made me think of was that idea that for men, getting into a serious, long-term relationship is more a frame of mind than anything to do with a girl. It’s that saying, “Women are ready to settle down when they feel they’ve found the right guy. For men, the ‘right girl’ is whoever they’re with when they’re finally decide they want to settle down”
Fantastic point. This may very well be true.
“For example, if we take self-development as a measure of success, then let’s take a look at some giants of self-help; Dale Carnegie, Napoleon Hill, Tony Robbins, Steve Covey, Brian Tracey…”
One thing I’ve always found interesting is that rock stars, porn stars, movie stars, etc., ALWAYS end up married and monogamous. But at the same time, “self-development” doesn’t necessarily equate emotional fulfillment or having emotional needs met. Half those people you listed have dark streaks and strong criticisms against their character. Even Gandhi.
But whoever said I was probably being a little dramatic with my last line is right. There’s no such thing as a person who is 100% emotionally stable, 100% baggage-free, 100% non-validation-seeking, and 100% happy at all times. Therefore, there’s always somebody for everybody, no matter how developed they become. But that’s the nature of the paradox… the more developed and experienced you become, the rarer and rarer it is to get your needs met while your ability to meet other people’s sexual and emotional needs expands and expands.
Think of someone like Jay-Z or Brad Pitt. On the one hand, half the women in the country would go to bed with them and marry them at the drop of a hat. But on the other hand, Brad Pitt’s selection of suitable women is really limited to super models, movie stars and other extremely high status people. Before you argue this, ask yourself, how many women out there can really even grasp the world he lives in? Very few. Really, only other famous people, people in the stratosphere of social status can even begin to relate to him emotionally. Now, before we all cry Brad a river, that’s an extremely small selection of women… maybe 100-200 worldwide. Maybe that’s why most stars end up with other stars or living somewhat lonely lives?
As for the rest of your post… I feel like you’re making my point for me. You’re naming nothing but celebrity and public figure after celebrity and public figure to meet a certain criteria. Honestly, how many women walking around in a club in your average US city fit even one of those criteria? It’s very rare.
Look, there are women out there SOMEWHERE for me. I suppose the melancholy tone of the article was the fact that five years ago, I would have been happy to date any decent-looking girl I met who gave me the time of day. Now, I’ll spend a whole night in a venue and not meet one I’m interested in seeing regularly.
“Nevertheless, it seems to me that you’re still blind to your own obsession with physical beauty. You may have reached a level where you can date a ‘7′, and not feel that her looks matter to you in making that decision. What if the women I’ve mentioned above fulfilled all of your criteria in terms of intellectual, emotional capacity, and spiritual development? Would you date them, despite the fact that they are not even ‘7’s? Personally, I don’t know if I would, and that’s something I know I have to overcome.”
You’re right. I’ll be 100% honest. I loved my ex to death. But her looks was something I never completely got past. It wasn’t a dealbreaker, and I obviously didn’t ever raise it as an issue or bring it out. But it was like a constant itch that pestered me. I do have abnormal standards and pre-occupation with physical beauty. Part of that may come from my job. Part of it may just be the bi-product of the amount of my experiences. But as time goes on, my standards in that department only go up. And as much as it hurts to say this, one of the primary things I’m looking for in my next girlfriend is a large upgrade in that department. It’s superficial, but I take a lot of pleasure from walking around with a really hot girl. I think every guy does.
Can I get over that? Maybe… One day, I’ll have to. Will I? I imagine when once a few kids pop out and I’m married, I’ll stop caring. But it’s important to me. And another thing I’ve noticed… I’ve lost about 30 pounds in the last year (waiting for the six pack before I post about it), and since losing all of this weight… I’ve become even stricter on physical looks and feel justified for it. My thinking is, “Well, I busted my ass and ate right and lost all that weight, why can’t she?” Call it what you will, but that’s how I’ve been feeling lately.
But often people’s tastes in women immediately after a relationship tend to be a reaction to the person they just broke up with.
And one last thing, before I get way too off-topic. I’m a fan of Pavlina’s as well, although I don’t read him religiously. But who’s to say dating an uglier woman is a noble thing? Who’s to say it wasn’t a confidence issue in him? From what I hear, he got very excited upon hearing about PUA a few years back, and in my experience, most guys who get turned on by PUA are guys who have something deep down they’re looking to resolve in regards to women.
Anyway, moving on…
“I think it would help if you could narrow this down a bit. Can you give an example of an intellectual interest of yours that girls should share, but don’t? I’ve found that few girls share my intellectual interests, but I don’t disqualify them for that.”
She doesn’t have to share my intellectual interests. She just needs to keep up with me intellectually. And I mean, she doesn’t even have to be a super-genius or anything. She just has to have something going on upstairs. If you haven’t noticed by now, I’m constantly intellectualizing shit. She needs to be able to handle that and at least converse.
What’s more unique about me though — and this isn’t true about all guys — is that I link intelligence with sexual attraction. This especially has become true the more time has gone on. Stupid girls sexually turn me off. Intelligent girls sexually turn me on. Just how I’m wired. *shrug*
At the end of the day (and this is directed at both Lou and Eros), all other things equal, every guy will happily trade up in the looks department. It’s more of a question of how much trouble are you willing to go through to find quality women who are also extremely beautiful, and/or what other qualities are you willing to sacrifice?
Like I said earlier, as I get older, the more I value things such as intelligence, personality, energy, humor, etc. and the less I value looks (despite my standards going up). And I imagine one day it’ll become a non-issue. But as for now… I’m entering my prime as a male. I’d like to try and find the best of all worlds if possible.
And finally…
“A guy I very much respect once said, the goal of pu/self development should be that you are able to give yourself everything you need and all you need your partner for is sex, because it’s more fun with two people involved.”
In theory, yes, we would all like to be emotionally self-sufficient. But in practice, I think this is a very anti-social and terrible way to look at things. Sex is actually pretty unimportant in the grand scheme of things. I’d rather have a woman I’m madly in love and be crippled (hello Sean Stephenson) than have all the sex I want and never feel anything with the women I fuck.
20 Comments
Reader
Reader
Ok dude, I have been reading you for a while. I spent a lot of years in Boston and thats how I got to know your stuff.
But I have to say man, I dont know what youre complaining about. You live an extraordinary lifestyle. I doubt youre extremely wealthy or anything like that, but you dont work a shit 9-5 and you basically get paid to go out.
You mentioned “getting older”…youre not that old though right? Arent you like mid to late 20s? So much game left man, seriously.
I have always liked that fact that your posts are well reasoned and thought out. But I honestly think you are thinking too much at this point. It sort of sounds like youre over pickup. Well if thats the case, then maybe you should shut it down for a while.
This shit is FUN, man. Just a point, maybe if you are thinking more in terms of “emotional needs” then you just need a girlfriend and need to leave the game.
I dont think anything you have said is unreasonable, however I have to say that as a reader I come here to hear stories about the game. Not saying that you have to give a shit about what I want, but Im just saying thats probably why most people read your stuff.
Contrasting some of your recent posts to somebody like Sinn, I mean that guy is in 100% and doesnt show any signs of wavering or fatiguing. I sort of feel like if youre in, you gotta be in 100%, and if youre not, you gotta do like your boy Doc Holliday did and just hang it up and dont look back.
One last point man, maybe you just need a change of pace. I moved to the West Coast from Boston and it was one of the best moves I ever made for a number of reasons.
Eros
Fuck, just had an enormous reply and then accidentally deleted it. Ok I’ll try to summarize. Edit: summarize fail.
1. The reason I used celebrities/ public figures is because you and I don’t know each other. I can’t say ‘my friend Jack’, because you don’t know anything about Jack! But that’s ok; I think using public figures/celebrities is pointless, because how well do we really know them? They do have some purpose though; if you were surprised by Tiger Woods cheating, then obviously you lack the ability to analyse a person on the most basic level. Quick side note to the world: that should not have been a shock to you!
2. As DFW says: what you worship defines your reality. The community worships beauty, not needing the approval of any woman, and being ’self-sufficient’. If you spend enough time in it, you will inevitably adopt that mindset, at least to some degree. Guys like Brad P, whose whole life appears to be centred on PUA, is so defined by those beliefs that he cannot possibly see his own misogyny. I read his ‘diary of a PUA’ and in it he describes coming on a girl’s ass in an alleyway, and then laughs at how she doesn’t wipe the cum off before pulling up her pants and going back to her friends. If the fact that he would decide to tell the reader a detail like this, which can in no way have a positive effect on a guy’s game or mindset towards women, doesn’t disturb you, then you need to remind yourself ‘this is water’.
3. If you do not believe that there are guys out there who would not trade up in the looks department, you will never find them, and you will never become one of them. These men are far and few between, but they do exist. They aren’t bugged by their wife of 20 or 30 or 40 years lack of hotness, and they probably would refuse to trade up in their looks department, because, and this will make all you seasoned pussy-crunchers vomit, ‘I love her the way she is’. My first girlfriend, the only girl I’ve ever loved, was only a ‘6′ or so, but I was perfectly happy with her the way she was. Now you can take the community viewpoint, and say that I was suffering from one-itus. You can argue that I was only happy with her looks because I didn’t believe in myself to get anyone better. Or you can say ‘this is water’, and see that some guys are truly happy with their girls. They DO NOT care about them being any hotter. Sure, if you offered for the next girl I fall in love with to look like Miranda Kerr, I would happily say yes. But while I was with the girl I was in love with, my response would have been ‘no, why the fuck are you asking me that? I want my girlfriend to look like herself, not Miranda Kerr’. Again; if you do not believe these guys exist, you will never find them, and you will never become one. You will meet these guys, but you will find reasons to burst that bubble. You will tell yourself that these guys are not truly happy, that they are settling, and that you know better. This is the attitude of the community in general. In our not so secret world we know best. Ours eyes have been opened to the reality of the AFC. We see men fawning over women and think ‘what a loser’. This happens so often that what eventually happens to us is that we develop the hammer and nail mindset. We see every non-community guy’s relationships with women as unsuccessful, and as proof of their beta-ness. And we always know the solution. So then when we finally do meet a guy who is in a loving relationship with a not so attractive woman, we look for reasons why he can’t really be satisfied. He has self-esteem issues. He’s self-deceiving. He needs our help!
One more time, because I’m an insistent dickhead, but also because I really really believe this: If you do not believe these men exist, you will never find them and you will never be one of them.
I don’t say this because I’m a know it all arsehole who thinks he knows better than you, but because I think you’re one of those guys out there fighting the good fight, and I really hope you come to agree with me.
4. I don’t know about Steve Pavlina. To be honest, the guy seems so bulletproof it’s impossible to know exactly what to think of him. He’s mentioned the PUA community in the past, and he says he’s generally quite against it, for a few reasons. There are the obvious ones, like that it’s misogynistic, and that it’s full of bad advice for the majority of guys who don’t need to be sold all that crap to make small simple fixes to lead a successful love life. Nothing new there. His strongest point against it is that he favours direct communication with women, rather than going through a longwinded flirting process. This is an interesting point about the community, especially as people have begun to favour direct game recently, but again, I don’t think he has anything new to say on it.
The thing is, when you reach a level of success like he has, there are inevitably going to be people trying to tear you down. Now perhaps what you’ve heard is true, and he does have confidence issues with women, or secretly desires to sleep with a whole lot of women, but thinks that would look bad to his readers.
What I’m saying is that from reading his blog over many years, I’ve never sensed any incongruency with what he claims to desire with women. Of all the blogs I read, yours and his are the two that I trust the most. You both are open with a readers in a way that some other bloggers attempt to be, but don’t achieve, because they aren’t really willing to let their weaknesses show.
When I read the post a while back about how you didn’t care that your girlfriend was a ‘7’, I sensed that wasn’t completely congruent with the truth. I’ve never felt that incongruency reading his blog. Don’t worry, I don’t think i’m some fucking sensai, it’s very easy to be completely mistaken over the internet.
I think the only way to really figure out how legitimate a guy like Steve Pavlina is if you actually get to know them, or at the very least meet them in person. Which is exactly what I intend to do later this year, when I attend one of his workshops in Las Vegas. Now, like I said before, I don’t know exactly what to make of a guy like him. I’ve spent enough time in the community and on this earth to know that most people are easily sucked in by the claims of someone with a strong frame. I expect that there’ll be a lot of people who are there just looking for someone to follow. So I’ll be sure to bring a healthy dose of cynicism, and if you’d like to hear my opinions of him then, I’m sure they’ll be pretty strong as a result.
On a final note, how much longer are you in Boston? I’m moving there in mid July, probably for about a year (I decided to come to the states, and despite it’s 3 awesome sports teams, and a couple of years of reading your blog, I only settled on it after rejecting 2 or 3 other cities). I’d love to get some one on one training before you leave, or if you return some time over that year. You still coach as much as I ever I assume.
Ok, so I just reread your post for the third time before posting this, and I feel like I didn’t give you your due.
“Like I said earlier, as I get older, the more I value things such as intelligence, personality, energy, humor, etc. and the less I value looks (despite my standards going up). And I imagine one day it’ll become a non-issue. But as for now… I’m entering my prime as a male. I’d like to try and find the best of all worlds if possible.”
That’s fair enough. I won’t delete what I wrote above though, because I feel it’s something that needs to be said more.
Also, I totally understand the whole desire to be understood issue. Honestly, the only women who have come close to truly understanding me were friends that I was never attracted to. I’ve always had high standards for my girlfriends, and I’m talking intellectually (triple degree student), physically (ex-cheerleader), and in terms of creative genius (Fine Arts degree). However, none of them properly understood my motivations, dreams, passions, etc, and I reached limits in my relationship with each of them because of that. That’s ok; I still think there are plenty of women out there who can do that for me one day. I just doubt I’ll find them in a bar at 2 am, and if I focus too much on the idea of them being beautiful as well as everything else, I’ll probably end up passing over some amazing women, who I only dismiss because of a part of my ego I never tried to get under my control.
@Reader: I don’t want to seem like I’m crying about this or complaining about my life. As we say in the community, “this is a high-value problem.”
But you’re right. I’m way over the “fuck 100 chicks and glorify it” phase of PUA. I left that phase behind about two years ago. It definitely has its place, but I haven’t been there in a long time, and the guys who stay there, in a sick way I kind of admire it, but I also don’t think it’s healthy in the long-term.
As for hanging it up, I would have 1-2 years ago except two reasons: 1) it’s my job and livelihood, and 2) I really think the PUA community could go much further and is really in its infant stages of development. I’d like to be a part of bringing it to a more mature, healthier and happier realm of learning for men.
@Eros: All solid points. I should clarify, I didn’t “hear” that about Steve, I’m just saying it could be true for all you know. I’ve never met Steve, and I’m sure he’s a phenomenal guy in person as well as on his blog. But you have to always, always remember, no one is bullet proof, and no matter how honest him or I are on our blogs, you’re still only getting a snippet of who we are.
As far as coaching, I’m planning on being in Boston through September and am still coaching. Shoot me an email and we can talk about it.
I don’t have anything to add to this discussion but I just wanted to say that I admire both Entropy and the commentors for keeping things civil and respecting each other’s views. This is one of the few PUA sites I visit anymore due to the high quality of the content here. Thank you everyone.
Just to say I second what H3x. I REALLY appreciate this about your blog Entropy – and you have some really good respectful posters which add to what you write…
Looks like I have a lot of catching up reading to do from this week!
If life is about self-development, it sounds like you might have more to learn by being a good partner to someone who isn’t your ideal, rather than someone who is. The gist I get from these two posts is that you’re looking for someone to make staying with them easy, and someone who affirms your worldview. That just seems a bit lazy to me.
As someone who’s been with someone who meets all of my “must have” criteria for over 4 years (we are both liberal, atheist Mensans with advanced degrees, vegetarian, animal lovers who don’t want children – both I’d say at least a 7 on the attractiveness scale) I came to the conclusion a while back that if I were ever actively dating again, my list of criteria wouldn’t be more restrictive, it’d be a lot more broad. Compromise is the single most important aspect of any relationship – and I think that goes not only for relationship maintenance, but choosing who to be involved with.
Doc Holliday
Great series of posts
Posting about my six pack… eat it
bumbidu
i cant take this serious…you are wierd entropy..wierd
Benjamin
This reminds me of this thing that I read on marketing theory. There’s optimisers, and satisfiers. Optimisers are the people that always want the best out of everything, that constantly chase improvement. Satisfiers are content with what they have. Consequently, the degree of happiness is higher in the second group.
In a way, a lot of PUA is the optimiser movement: improve what you have, get the best. Then, here and there, there are the voice that call to ‘be happy with what you have’, ‘be happy in the now’, ‘feel good about yourself no matter what’. It seems these two threads run parallel: optimise on the one hand while being happy with what you have at the same time.
Is it possible? My guess it’s an eternal balancing act, returning to satisfaction and departing to improvement cyclically and ceaselessly.
Really interesting Ben. I actually just read recently that the University of Chicago did a widespread study on happiness and found two things: 1) married men are on average happier than single men, and 2) single men who are not dating are on average happier than single men who are.
As a group of compulsive single male daters, we’re statistically one of the unhappiest groups out there.
www.EntropyPUA.com – The Abundance Paradox
[...] last few posts (here and here) caused quite a stir of debate. Both in the comments here, through email, and even on other blogs. [...]
Weekend Link Fest – Limo edition « Seasons of Tumult and Discord
[...] The Isolation Paradox, The Isolation Paradox, Ctd., The Abundance [...]
Dude
Hey man, interesting stuff you’ve been posting lately.
I’m not trying to take a jab at you but I’d like to make a point that someone by the name of “onenatural” on a certain site that hates on puas wrote awhile back that opened up my eyes on this kind issue, why do you think you’re entitled to this calibar of woman? What makes you think you deserve this type of woman??
Okay so you want a chick who can match your wits, understand you’re world and also be arm candy, well maybe you don’t deserve that kind of girl, maybe you haven’t done enough or will never do enough to get a girl like that, maybe your not good looking enough or don’t make enough money etc to have that kind of woman.
Again not trying to take you down a peg or whatever, its just something to think about.
JohnnyK
I can relate to a lot of what you’re saying Entropy.
It’s really hard to figure out if I’m being too picky when I’m 80% sold on a girl that I know I’d have been 200% sold on 3 years ago.
jayc
I agree with you on so many levels.
I steer clear of having one-itis now, but there’s something I’m curious about. I haven’t encountered this before. I love beautiful girls and love to be seen with them, but lately there’s this particular girl who’s not that pretty, but her…sexuality and intelligence make a really great mix and we have almost perfect chemistry, and I’m kind of torn if I should pursue her or the other HB 8-10 girls (I’d rate her 6).. I’m new to feeling this way. Usually I wouldn’t even think about it and instantly go for the other HB 8-10 girls. Shes kind of different and I cant believe I’m writing this, cause this means she really does have an effect on me. haha. shit. she’s even got me chasing her. bloody hell.
I am usually “shallow” as some may call it, I mean, I appreciate a beautiful woman…
This relates to your post because…even though I am presented with <HB options, I am more curious about what "emotional" perks this one could provide my life with. Could it be a real emotional connection?
PS: is gagging while writing this a bad sign?
Haha… it’s fine. Yeah, it’s shallow, but I think part of being a single guy and definitely a part of being in the community is to condition us to be a bit shallow.
First off Jay, I’ll give you the same advice I give every guy who is starting to feel some serious emotions for a girl: don’t force anything. Whatever it is, let it play itself out naturally. If you find yourself wanting to see her every day, then do it. If you find yourself not caring about other girls you’re seeing, then stop seeing other girls. If you get sick of her and want to go bang someone else, then do that. If there’s something legitimate there (and it sounds like there may be), you’ll naturally just want to spend all of your time with her.
And to answer your question, in my experience those “emotional perks” outweigh any hotness by a mile. When I met my last girlfriend, I was dating a model (super hot) and this girl who ran track at her school (ridiculous body). My ex was cute, but not very hot… a 7 at most, not as hot as the track chick and DEFINITELY no where near the model’s caliber. But the way you describe this girl is exactly how I started feeling — mindblowing sex all the time, chemistry through the roof — whereas a lot of girls I wouldn’t even sleep over at their place half the time, I found myself staying up to 5am with her just talking and goofing around together. I’d find the next day I wouldn’t want to go home… and it scared the shit out of me at first too.
Anyway, I ended up dating her for two years. She probably doesn’t even crack the top 50% of hottest girls I’ve banged. But those two years were some of the happiest I’ve ever had. I wouldn’t trade a single day back.
I say go for it.
Shiva
I only recently have stumbled upon your blog. It is one of the most interesting, well write out blogs on PUA and the community in general. So long have I struggled with girls to the point it was embarrassing. For the past 6 months I have turned to confidence building first, working on more inner game, and now I am seeing great results. That adds little value to this particular thread, and for that I apologize.
What I did want to discuss is the power of the subconscious mind. I am currently working/searching websites for NLP and other subconscious efforts to improve habits. Also, this has brought me to believe in finding what my subconscious wants by using techniques and exercises. One I can figure that out, I believe I would be able to find the girl that meets the needs of my subconscious (attractive enough, intelligent enough, dealing with habits) and meeting half way with my conscious thoughts (much of the same). I highly recommend you all try these techniques too, it has made a great improvement in my life.
I am not pegging for any websites or anything particular, simply a suggestion that many can benefit from.
Doc Holliday
“I’ll be 100% honest. I loved my ex to death. But her looks was something I never completely got past. It wasn’t a dealbreaker, and I obviously didn’t ever raise it as an issue or bring it out. But it was like a constant itch that pestered me. I do have abnormal standards and pre-occupation with physical beauty. Part of that may come from my job. Part of it may just be the bi-product of the amount of my experiences. But as time goes on, my standards in that department only go up. And as much as it hurts to say this, one of the primary things I’m looking for in my next girlfriend is a large upgrade in that department.”
- Mark “Entropy”
“The hottest girls rarely make us the happiest.”
- Mark “Entropy”
lol, nobody asked you…
Leave a Reply
Most Popular Content
- What "No" Really Means
- Discipline
- Balance and Perspective
- Discipline Clarification
- Casual Sex Can Lead to Love
- Looks Do Matter
- I Slept With Entropy And...
- Looks Do Matter
- Casual Sex Can Lead to Love
- What “No” Really Means
- I Slept With Entropy And…
- Discipline Clarification
- Discipline
- Balance and Perspective
- Quote for the Day
- The Three Fundamentals
- Your Pick Up Techniques Don’t Matter
- Porn Use and Sexual Anxiety
- Damn good post !
It's funny to realize that guys tend to digress look as mu...
- Im glad you pointed this out.
For many many guys strongly for new guys this bel...
- Guys blow this out of proportion just like women do. There have been times where...
- What always gets me about appearances is girls can think a wide variety of male ...
- Entropy, you are the thinking man's PUA. Every post is interesting and thought-p...
- "Women won’t take the initiative even if they do want it. Typically, if you wa...
- Helen Fisher is the shit. Her research has changed my perspective on relationshi...
- It is absolutely true. Other research has hinted at this, most notably an articl...
News - Jun 11, 2010 10:03 - 6 Comments
Changes
More In News
- Who Lies More, Men or Women?
- Global Pickup Conference
- Meet Me at the 2010 Dating Conference in NYC
- Public Service Announcement
- False Alarm
Other, PUA Skills, PUA Theory - Jul 21, 2010 16:14 - 21 Comments
Your Pick Up Techniques Don’t Matter
More In PUA Skills
- Porn Use and Sexual Anxiety
- Relating to Others Well
- Getting Over Being Rusty
- Interview with Rob Judge
- Three Conversation Tricks
Attraction, PUA Theory - Aug 30, 2010 13:37 - 4 Comments
Looks Do Matter
More In PUA Theory
- What “No” Really Means
- Discipline Clarification
- Discipline
- The Three Fundamentals
- Your Pick Up Techniques Don’t Matter
Is this going to let me post or am I going to be flagged as spam?