Approaching, Conversations, PUA Skills, PUA Theory - Written by Entropy on Saturday, October 18, 2008 11:31 - 2 Comments
Approaching and Social Calibration
I was out coaching last night and my student and I were talking about how different guys have different sticking points and how different guys are able to push themselves to different extents. And I kind of had this interesting realization.
One of the major sticking points of guys who come into the community is that they lack basic social skills. They are simply unable to maintain a coherent conversation without being awkward.
There are also some people who are insanely driven and will open 10 sets a night, five nights a week for a year straight. They’ll try and memorize every routine and spout anything they read online to the exact word.
What always kind of baffled me was these are usually the same people. It just seemed like an overarching coincidence.
This may seem kind of obvious now, but I realized last night that the REASON these guys are able to open constantly, all day, every day is because they don’t understand social norms and therefore aren’t influenced by social norms.
The root of approach anxiety and the reason guys who already have good social skills have trouble pushing themselves is because they are too aware of the social norms and they’re aware that they have to break the social norms. Guys who lack social skills aren’t even aware of the social norms, therefore pushing themselves to approach 100 sets a week doesn’t even occur to them as difficult.
…and gosh darnit, people like me…
2 Comments
shift
Selwyn
Exactly what I’ve noticed in my ENTIRE LIFETIME. I’m 17 btw. The thing is, if you notice, the ones who are the highest in school are not the ones who are intelligent. They’re the ones who work hard and consistent, and yeah, studied their asses off.
Whereas those of us who are rather intelligent, and can think beyond the average mugger, believe so much in our own intelligence that we let ourselves down in every damn exam, by not working as hard for it. The same thing applies to approach anxiety as well I guess. Oh and btw, those who DO work hard, they arent the socially comfortable ones.
So my question really is, who wins? The ones who study real hard and who have no understanding of social norms; or the ones who have a certain degree of intelligence and belief in that intelligence, and have more understanding of social norms, so much so that it hinders them. The character on
‘Grey’s Anatomy’, Dr.Burke, said in an episode, “I was never the smartest in class, but what I lacked in natural ability, I made up for in discipline. I practised.” Who wins?
Leave a Reply
Most Popular Content
- New Site, Blog Moved
- Pick Up is NOT a Skill
- College Starting Back Up
- I Slept With Entropy And…
- Quote for the Day
- Weekend Humor
- Wednesday Humor
- Changes
- Wingman Retreat in the Caribbean
- Who Lies More, Men or Women?
- Styles and Locality
- I'm happy for you man. Great to see you moving forward going beyond pick up. Def...
- On it... thanks for the suggestion....
- Can you put up an archives or index session which is just a long list of all the...
- Thanks for the tip.
And yeah, I'm hitting the google keywords hard....
- Yeah, notice it too Kevin. Good luck with that :)
Here's a pratical tip: redi...
- Hm, first impression of the new site is that you picked most of your articles ti...
- Damn son, so the day came. Awesome. Good for you.
Speaking of nick names - pe...
- New game, new luck, Entropy, ahm, I mean Mark!
Will miss the comments about y...
News - Sep 29, 2010 5:34 - 8 Comments
New Site, Blog Moved
More In News
- Changes
- Who Lies More, Men or Women?
- Global Pickup Conference
- Meet Me at the 2010 Dating Conference in NYC
- Public Service Announcement
Actually I found this thing through school as well – with intelligence and study.
A lot of the people I know who aren’t that naturally ’smart’ studied their asses off to understand everything and they eventually did really well, whereas everyone else (I was one of these) just kinda cruised along and got mediocre marks.