Was this the RSD forum lol? They seem to be having one of those epiphanies every day.

Great post man. I see a lot of guys who walk in a set and get immediate IOI’s and just start throwing negs and fucking the set up beyond repair. Perfect reason to calibrate your game.

On a side note,
i can’t fucking stand everyone hating on the guys over at RSD. Blueprint is the gold standard when it comes to inner game, hands down. Fucking keyboard jockeys

Hope it will stay this way!

matrix,
RSD is NOT the gold standard for inner game. State control or pumping your BT maybe, but not inner game itself. (significant difference) While I agree that negging when you already have attraction is uncalibrated, we can’t forget that some people don’t have attraction from the start and may need to tease/ neg or display some sort of value to gain attraction (hence this article)

aaron, this was a post on the local boston lair.

Btw I was just against the whole negative language, am tired of it on the forums.

As for RSD’s Blueprint you might be surprised – I think it’s great BUT damn expensive at full price ($400+).

It really did connect a few dots for me about two years ago, though I must admit I’ve since found similar ideas in other self-development books.

Verdict – it really is great for discussing state but I’m not sure if I would recommend a friend of mine buy it. As a hardback it would cost $15-30 on Amazon, yet because it’s from a 4-day seminar it’s much much more. A pity, really…

I usually only talk about stuff like this in person (the last thing I want to do on the internet is ignite some sort of flame war)… but I have to disagree with Matrix.

For anyone who’s very familiar with Tony Robbins, David Deida and Eckhart Tolle, there’s little to no new ideas in The Blueprint. And what drives me absolutely insane — RSD or otherwise — is when people express ideas and imply that they’re their own when they’re not. With the exception of David D, people in this industry NEVER give credit for where they got their information, and I just find it intellectually dishonest.

90% of the “theory” out there can be traced directly back to either: self help, NLP, and evolutionary biology. I don’t know why everyone needs to feel like they’re reinventing the wheel here… men have been chasing tail since the beginning of time. There’s nothing new under the sun, nor has there ever been.

Yes, the material on Blueprint is very in-depth and very useful, but little of it is actually Tyler’s imo.

People shit on Dr. Paul, but I found his stuff to be far deeper, more directly applicable and 100% original.

Definately #1 PUA is Entropy

Who is this Dr. Paul guy you´re talking about? Is it this “How we fall in love” psychologist? Or this Tai Chi guy?

I actually thought the blueprint was pure shit, because it just ran the most main stream self-help stuff at the time and marketed it as their new cutting edge thing, I am fairly well read, I actually stopped after the first 3 dvds, if you have not read the very popish power of now, unleashing the giant etc then I guess it will be eye opening but it will be a total turnoff to a person who has and reads way beyond it.

I liked The Blueprint. I didn’t pay $400 for it, because that would be fucking stupid, but the product itself is pretty interesting. I’ve tried to get through Eckhart Tolle and Tony Robbins, but just can’t do it. I think the Blueprint worked for me because it’s linked to a specific subject that I’m interested in, i.e. getting girls.

RaKe dude?? Blueprint is soo long I didnt bother looking at it. Its disorganized thinking without structure.
The guy is all over talking about different stuff to a point of dizziness. Its too much info IMO.
He sounds like he needs to hang with naturals to stop overthinking this .lol. Its better to Keep it simple S.

It is so true that Attraction is very fluctuating.

Just last night when I was out with some friends I went to the toilet and a girl was there and a guy was telling me, “She is very hardcore!” and I told her then, “Oh, you like it hard, don’t you?” and she said to me, “Not with you!”.

This was typical ASD from her part since I was too sexual, and also in front of guys. But it also didn’t sound like “she was attracted to me” and if attraction would either be there or not I should have been screwed.

But later on, when I approached a table of girls she sat there, and when I had ran my opener she was the first one of them to ask for my name (a classic IOI).

It was almost like her past comment, “not with you!” never meant anything.

I usually categorize attraction in three different ways, “Instantenous Attraction”, “Momentarily Attraction” and “Rationalized Attraction”, it’s of course still “attraction” I’m talking about, but it’s different ways it manifests itself.

The categories are of course based on my real-life experiences and not by “guessing” or just “theorizing without any kind of support”.

/ Max K.

Another Great article

Speaking of David D…

His Mantransformation Seminar is by far the most powerful inner game course i’ve ever gone through…